Jean Charest has tremendous charisma, a lot of media support and a lot of hype, but up to now, very little substance. He can get away with this for the next half year or perhaps somewhat longer, but will ultimately have to come to grips with real issues. Québec voters are incredibly volatile. They want to hear about social change. Charest will need to focus on policy and programmes, attracting investment. However, in the lead-up to an election, the more substantive the platform, the more vulnerable.
Many Québecois are tired of the brooding, self-centered leadership of the PQ. What they are looking for is a cheer-leader!
In support of this there were comments from a guest who arrived from the rally held for Charest in LaSalle. It was a great success, some 700 people crowded into a room more suited to 400, no food, no drink. Many ethnic communities represented, blacks, Sikhs, Italians, generally working class voters. Lisa Frulla and John Ciaccia were there. When Jean Charest appeared the room went wild. Young Liberals were signing up new members. Very emotional atmosphere. Charest criticized Bouchard, Landry, over-crowded hospitals, no jobs.
Up to this point M. Charest has been building up a lot of support by restricting his campaign to mostly anglophone ridings. He has a great ability to rally voters who are already committed, but when he begins to address policy, he can afford to (and will) discount the anglo-allo vote which has nowhere else to go.
The electorate and the media are eagerly awaiting the results when he moves into Parti Québecois territory. In order to win decisively, his campaign must be successful with the eighty-two percent of Québecois who are francophone. If he is to be successful, he must emerge with something new. He must risk losing the support of both the radical and traditional wings of the QLP and come up with a platform that is different, one that goes straight up the middle.
The window of opportunity remains open for six months to a year if no election is called in the intervening period. If during this time, he can put together a quality "Brains Trust", his chance for success is impressive. Right now, it is obvious that he is observing the party structure and will be making up his mind about who his advisors and team should be. The Party is highly polarized, there is a lot of work to be done in bringing about cohesion. Many heads will roll in the next few months. The risk is that he will bring along the Old Guard Conservative bagmen. On the other hand, he has the qualities and the timing to be a generational politician, introducing a younger, fresher approach and appealing to the more sophisticated outward looking francophones in their 20's and 30's.
As for Lucien Bouchard, he appears to be on his way out. His probable successor does not have the appearance of a winner. Appearances however can be deceptive and M. Bouchard has proven to be the "consummate politician", blossoming in times of adversity in the past.
It will be an interesting campaign and election to watch. In summary, once inside the voting booth, "The electorate will have to choose between a failed philosophy and an undefined one".
The evening ended with a debate on the requirements for professionals to pass language tests. Very few if any of the guests were passionate on this issue.
Reported by
Herbert Bercovitz and Michael Judson
Edited by Diana Thébaud Nicholson
The CRTC and/or Canadian Culture
Our page on the CRTC and the RULES
and CRTC-SM Parker Barss Donham's Column 5 August 1998 "CRTC and the Internet"
A N N O U N C E M E N T S
Attention was drawn to the beautiful floral centrepiece decorating the
table, a gift from Councilor Cynthia Lulham to thank David
for his effort in creating original photos and text on this westweb
site. Cynthia credited this with helping to win the